Now, I know that the show Wicked is very different from the book. It has a more bittersweet ending, many characters and plot threads are dropped, and the fates of certain characters completely changed. The stage show strips out a lot of the sex and politics (seriously, the book could be the next Game of Thrones series on HBO), However, when the person who wrote the book has attended the show dozens of times in the first four years it opened, I think it's safe to say that the edits aren't really all that bad.
There was another prequel to The Wizard Of Oz that came out not too long ago, so I guess the question is which one did a better job telling a good story? Let's break the two down and see where each one went right and where each one went wrong.

